When processing an annual contract that is paid in monthly installments (e.g., a 12-month service agreement), it's crucial to select the correct method within the Microix Workflow Modules to ensure proper budget tracking and integration with MIP Fund Accounting.
Here are the three standard methods, with a clear recommendation for best practices.
You have a purchase order (PO) for an annual contract, but payment is made monthly.
Example:
Annual amount: $12,000
Monthly payments: $1,000 x 12 months
You want your accounting system to reflect both the total commitment ($12,000) and the monthly disbursement ($1,000).
This is the most common used method for fund accounting, as it properly manages budget encumbrances.
Requisition/PO: Create a single Purchase Order in Microix for the full annual amount (e.g., $12,000).
Terms: In the PO description, note "To be paid in 12 monthly installments of $1,000."
Invoicing: As each $1,000 monthly invoice is received, create an Invoice in the Microix using the Encumbrance Balance button to apply it against the original $12,000 PO.
Balance: The system will automatically track the remaining balance on the PO, reducing it by $1,000 each time a monthly invoice is processed and posted.
Pros:
Encumbrance: This is the key benefit. MIP Fund Accounting will immediately encumber the full $12,000 commitment, providing an accurate picture of your remaining budget.
Audit Trail: Creates a clean audit trail, linking all 12 monthly payments directly to a single, approved PO.
Budget Control: Prevents overspending, as the total commitment is visible from the start.
Cons:
While using encumbrances provides accurate budget control, it also introduces extra administrative complexity. Each encumbrance generates a separate document that must be tracked, approved, and later transferred to MIP for payment processing. Furthermore, when a purchase order’s value needs to be increased (for example, due to contract amendments) or liquidated (to release unused funds), additional steps are required to create and approve encumbrance modification documents. These adjustments must go through their own workflow in Microix and MIP Fund Accounting, adding more time and coordination to the overall process. This can slow down invoice processing and increase the workload on both accounting and departmental staff.
This method involves creating a new, separate PO each month for the monthly amount.
Requisition/PO: Each month, a user submits a new Requisition for $1,000.
Approval: This Requisition must go through the full Microix approval workflow every time.
Invoicing: The $1,000 invoice is then processed against that specific month's PO.
Pros:
Simple to match one invoice to one PO.
Copy function can facilitate the creation of the 12 separate documents
Cons:
High Administrative Burden: Creates significant, repetitive work by requiring 12 separate Requisitions and approval cycles.
Poor Budget Visibility: Fails to show the total $12,000 annual commitment in MIP. The budget only shows a $1,000 obligation, making true budget-to-actual reporting difficult.
This advanced method leverages the "Recurring" functionality in a different way, creating a single "Standing Order" PO that manages the entire years' worth of payments in one document without the need to use encumbrance and allow Microix to obligate the total obligation against the budget.
Requisition/PO: Create a single Purchase Order in Microix for the full annual commitment.
Line Items: Instead of one line for $12,000, create 12 separate line items for $1,000 each. Each line should be dated or described for the specific month it covers (e.g., "Line 1: Jan Service - $1,000", "Line 2: Feb Service - $1,000"). NOTE: This process can complete using the Bulk Update feature>Reoccurring Payments option.
Invoicing: As each $1,000 monthly invoice is received, it is processed as a payment against its specific corresponding line item on the PO.
Approval: The system can be configured so that processing the payment/invoice against each line item routes through an approval workflow.
Pros:
Superior Tracking: This is the cleanest method for matching one invoice to one line item, providing exceptional granularity.
Single Source of Truth: The entire annual commitment is contained within one PO document, making it easy to see the full contract.
Flexible Approvals: Allows for a final approval check on each monthly payment, which is excellent for control.
Cons:
There is no single "best" method; the correct choice depends entirely on your organization's specific rules for encumbrance and budget control.
Use Method 1 (Single PO, Single $12k Line)
This is the required method if your organization's policy is to encumber all obligations and have that encumbrance immediately apply against the budget within MIP Fund Accounting.
Why: Creating a single PO for the full $12,000 amount is the simplest and most direct way to post the entire commitment to the MIP general ledger.
Result: Anyone running a budget-to-actual report in MIP will see the full $12,000 obligation, providing the most accurate picture of your true remaining budget.
Use Method 3 (Single PO, 12 Monthly Lines)
This is the best method if your organization does not require the full $12,000 to be formally encumbered in MIP, but you still need to enforce the total $12,000 budget for the contract.
Why: the Microix module itself can enforce budget controls. In this scenario, Microix will check the total obligation of $1200 against MIP's Budget value.
Result: This provides excellent operational control and tracking. The budget is enforced by Microix, preventing overspending on the contract, even though MIP's ledger does not show the full $12,000 as an encumbrance.